My first job in New York City was as 'Content Editor' at PC Magazine in 1997. That meant I hand-coded all their articles, sometimes up to 200/day. The idea of a dynamic, database-driven site was still new and there were no good solutions at the time. The best was to use Microsoft Word's mail-merge function, placing all the content in an Excel file and opening the HTML template in Word, then merging them together to generate the static pages.
When I was there, Bill Ziff still owned Ziff-Davis and ran the show. It was a privately-held company in a boom time and things were good. Once each year the entire staff (150 or so people) would be sent to a tropical island (a different one each year) for an "editorial retreat". When I was there we went to Barbados. It was awesome.
Then, Mr. Ziff, being older and in not-so-good health, sold the business to an investment company who took it public. The IPO was a big deal but everything pretty much turned to crap after that (and certainly no more tropical retreats). I quit after that.
I don't think it's a good idea for media companies to be publicly-held. Print publications in particular rely on the staff's intellect and creativity and loyalty to the brand - it's much more like actors in a play than factory workers on an assembly line. But public companies seem to always treat staff more like machines than their private counterparts.
The best news sources I can think of are the New York Times and National Public Radio. If either of those became public companies their quality would suffer.
Recent comments
19 weeks 10 hours ago
28 weeks 5 days ago
40 weeks 12 hours ago
41 weeks 10 hours ago
41 weeks 17 hours ago
1 year 2 weeks ago